Buying or Selling Top 9 2026 National Championship Contenders in Men's College Basketball
Joe Buglewicz/Getty Images
Kerry MillerFeb 11, 2026
There are nine men's college basketball teams with consensus 2026 national championship odds (per Vegas Insider) of +2000 or better. Which ones are worth buying at their respective odds and which ones would we not touch with a 10-foot pole?
For each team, we'll make a case for buying and a case for selling before offering up a verdict. Teams are presented in ascending order of consensus title odds, which were captured Tuesday morning.
- Kansas Jayhawks
1 of 9
Consensus Odds: +1617
Reason to Buy: Darryn Peterson
Bill Self is one of the greatest active coaches. Flory Bidunga is one heck of a force in the paint, especially on defense. And Melvin Council Jr. has shown he can take a game over at a moment's notice. But, come on. If you're picking Kansas to win it all, it's because the Jayhawks are going to (maybe, hopefully) have the most talented player on the floor in every game that they play. The Darryn Peterson experience has been a disjointed one, fraught with absences, but also a mystifying one as he shines in spite of his injuries. He's not going to be the National Player of the Year simply because he missed too much time. But he'd be a darn good pick for Most Outstanding Player of the upcoming tournament.
Reason to Sell: Too Inconsistent, Especially Away From Home
Even with Peterson playing, the Jayhawks lost at UCF, lost at West Virginia, lost at North Carolina, needed overtime to survive at NC State and needed some late Peterson heroics to win at Texas Tech (on a night where the Red Raiders didn't have Christian Anderson). They do play at Iowa State this Saturday and at Arizona on the 28th to potentially change the narrative in a massive way. But while the nation's truly elite teams have shown a repeatable ability to take their show on the road, Kansas arguably has not. Moreover, can we trust Peterson to stay healthy for six games? Or will he at some point be watching yet another second-half meltdown from the bench?
Verdict: Buying
This line suggests Kansas barely has a six percent chance of winning it all, and that feels almost laughably low. Peterson could be this year's Kemba Walker who simply puts the team on his back on the way to a title. If you could somehow guarantee that Peterson will play at least 32 minutes in each of Kansas' tournament games, I suspect this line would be closer to +800.
- Iowa State Cyclones
2 of 9
Consensus Odds: +1517
Reason to Buy: Most Complete Cyclones Team...Ever?
There were years under Fred Hoiberg and Steve Prohm where it felt like Iowa State could just score its way to a Final Four, relentlessly efficient on offense. And for the first couple years of the T.J. Otzelberger era, the Cyclones had a turnover-forcing defense that could befuddle just about any foe. They never did make it even to an Elite Eight in the past 25 years, though.
But now, they've got the best of both worlds, borderline top 10 in both offensive and defensive efficiency, posting their best marks in KenPom history (https://kenpom.com/history.php?t=Iowa+St.) in both effective field-goal percentage and offensive rebounding percentage. The loss at Kansas got out of hand in a hurry, but the win at Purdue was quite the heads up that Iowa State is a problem.
Reason to Sell: Lack of Playmaking Guards
6'8" wing Milan Momcilovic is one of the purest shooters in the nation. 6'9" big man Joshua Jefferson does it all, averaging around 17 points, eight rebounds and five assists per game. And point guard Tamin Lipsey averages close to five assists (and two steals) per turnover. At various points during every deep NCAA tournament run, though, you need that dude who is just going to go get you a bucket in a pivotal moment to either stop a run or deliver a knockout blow. And though there are a lot of things to love about this Iowa State team, there is a jarring lack of that Walter Clayton Jr., Tristen Newton or Jared Butler type of dude.
Verdict: Selling
In addition to the guard dilemma noted above, Iowa State simply doesn't have many great wins this season. The 81-58 shellacking of the Boilermakers was mighty impressive, but it was the Cyclones getting shellacked at Kansas the only time they've faced a top-40 foe in the past two months. Starting to feel like that win in Mackey was more of a stunning development than a sign of an impending Final Four run.
- Florida Gators
3 of 9
Consensus Odds: +1500
Reason to Buy: Scorching Hot, Yet Again
It was around this time last year that Florida started gaining steam on its championship run, going on the road and beating then-No. 1 Auburn before mostly rampaging its way through the rest of the season. This year, maybe the Gators started to peak a bit too early, but they've been easily one of the five best teams in the nation dating back to mid-December, pummeling the likes of Alabama, Tennessee and Texas A&M and scoring what felt at the time like a colossal road win over Vanderbilt a few weeks ago. Good luck finding a better frontcourt than Florida's. Led by Thomas Haugh, Alex Condon and the relentless rebounding presence of Rueben Chinyelu, the Gators are +230 in rebound margin over their last 14 games, and they made 37 two-point buckets in their recent rout of the Crimson Tide.
Reason to Sell: Perimeter Play
Through 23 games, Florida has just three players who have made at least 10 threes this season—one of whom, Xaivian Lee, is shooting 25.0 percent for the year. In all six of their losses (as well as in eight of their wins) the Gators have been held to 28 percent or worse from the perimeter. Moreover, they typically don't force many turnovers on defense. Though, when they have generated a decent number of steals and fast-break buckets, that's when they start feeling like that runaway freight train from yesteryear.
Verdict: Buying
At some point, the Gators either need Lee to turn a corner or they need to give more of his minutes to Urban Klavzar. But if they get that shooting guard spot worked out, they're going to be even more of a problem than they already have been—and they've been looking for more than a month now like a team that could repeat as national champions.
- Connecticut Huskies
4 of 9
Consensus Odds: +1433
Reason to Buy: Dan Hurley Can Coach
National champs in 2023. National champs in 2024. Lost by a deuce to the eventual national champ in 2025. Say what you will about his in-game antics and his potty mouth in post-game pressers, but Dan Hurley sure does know a thing or two about getting a team ready to play its best basketball in March. This Huskies team is also every bit as good on defense as the two that won it all. Tarris Reed Jr. is a force in the paint, while Silas Demary Jr. has very active hands along the perimeter. As a result, most opponents struggle to get to 65 points against the Huskies.
Reason to Sell: Not Exactly Flexing Its Muscles
You hate to put a "yeah, but" asterisk on a months-long winning streak. However, Connecticut was ranked ninth on KenPom after it started out 4-1, and the Huskies were ranked 13th on KenPom about 10 weeks later when they were 20-1. They did have several fantastic nonconference wins over Illinois, Florida and Kansas, but they also seemed to sleepwalk through basically all of January, repeatedly getting tested by Big East teams that shouldn't have any business hanging with title contenders. Granted, at least they kept winning. The 2022-23 UConn team went through a stretch of six losses in eight conference games before turning a corner in early February and going on a tear. Maybe this team was also "load managing" its way through the doldrums of January and will roar into March like a lion again? But for the time being, it hasn't looked like a wagon.
Verdict: Buying
Demary is going to need to cut down on the turnovers and it'd be swell if Solo Ball's night-to-night production wasn't such a game of whack-a-mole. It was clear early in the season, though, that full-strength UConn can beat anyone in the country. And for a team that has a pretty good shot at a No. 1 seed, +1450 is good value.
- Illinois Fighting Illini
5 of 9
Consensus Odds: +1167
Reason to Buy: Keaton Wagler Is Dynamite
The Illini's superstar freshman had an off night in Saturday's overtime loss to Michigan State, but Keaton Wagler had been the best player in the entire country (https://barttorvik.com/playerstat.php?link=y&minGP=1&year=2026&start=20251201&end=20260206) from the beginning of December through the first few days of February. He is hardly a one-man show, though. They've had eight players make at least 16 three-pointers this season, and everyone who plays is a factor on the offensive glass for a team that leads the nation in offensive efficiency (https://kenpom.com/index.php?s=RankAdjOE). And Illinois has been awesome away from home, beating Tennessee in Nashville, winning true road games against Nebraska, Purdue and Iowa and darn near winning at Michigan State the other night.
Reason to Sell: Doesn't Force Turnovers
You definitely don't have to be the best turnover-forcing team in the country to win a national championship, but it doesn't bode well that Illinois ranks dead last (https://kenpom.com/stats.php?s=RankDTO_Pct) in that department. What else is new for the Illini, though? They were minus-six or worse in turnover margin in four of their last five NCAA tournament losses, but Brad Underwood keeps not making that a priority. (On the plus side: Not hunting steals means less ticky-tack fouls and minimal free throws allowed. Illinois averages eight more made free throws per game than its opposition, so who needs steals?)
Verdict: Selling
While I do love this Illini team, they are a little too reliant on the deep ball, averaging more than 31 three-point attempts per game—more than 51 percent of their field-goal attempts. Even 2018 Villanova wasn't that addicted to triples, and the only team in the KenPom era (since 1997) to even reach the Sweet 16 while taking more than half of its shots (over the course of the full season) from three-point range was 2006 West Virginia—who didn't beat a single-digit seed. At some point in the tournament, Illinois is going to have an off night from distance, and it isn't wired to create the fast-break opportunities to overcome it.
- Houston Cougars
6 of 9
Consensus Odds: +842
Reason to Buy: Turnover Margin
Houston leads the nation in turnover percentage on offense while also ranking fifth on defense, good for a year-to-date turnover margin of +152. Combine that with elite offensive rebounding and the Cougars average 11.1 more field-goal attempts per game than they allow. And because they are so darn tough on defense, opponents don't even make 40 percent of the shots that they do manage to take. Add it all up and Houston is a wrecking ball, per usual. This team has made it at least to the Sweet 16 in six consecutive tournaments, and it feels safe to assume they'll at least extend that streak to seven.
Reason to Sell: Frontcourt Offense
Chris Cenac Jr. is starting to emerge as a more consistent weapon on offense, but he also attempted one shot in 18 minutes played in the loss at Texas Tech. Joseph Tugler is an outstanding defender and offensive rebounder, but he is a limited, reluctant scorer, yet to eclipse a dozen points in Big 12 play. He, too, took just one shot in 23 minutes at Texas Tech. And backup big man Kalifa Sakho averages nearly 10 minutes played per shot attempt. Houston does get plenty of scoring inside the arc, but a ton of it comes from Kingston Flemings and Emanuel Sharp on drives. If they run into an opponent that can keep Flemings in check—no easy task, but we're talking about potential pitfalls for top teams here—Houston cannot very well bank on its big men to pick up the slack.
Verdict: Buying
Houston almost won it all last year, and this team might have an even higher ceiling. They don't shoot threes or block shots anywhere near as well as yesteryear, but they are relentless and have hit their stride ever since fully handing the reins to Flemings in December. There's also a chance they'll basically be playing home games in the second weekend, as the Sweet 16 and Elite 8 of the South Regional will be held in Houston, and the Cougars are allowed to be sent there.
- Duke Blue Devils
7 of 9
Consensus Odds: +683
Reason to Buy: Cameron Boozer and Elite Defense
It's one thing to have the clear-cut choice for National Player of the Year at your disposal, which is what Duke has with Cameron Boozer. Not only is he leading the Blue Devils in points, rebounds, assists and steals, but he's leading the ACC in the first two categories and ranks around 10th in the league in the latter two. He is even more equipped to single-handedly take over a game than Cooper Flagg was last year. It's another thing to also have a defense that ranks third in the nation in adjusted efficiency, allowing fewer than 64 points per game. That combination puts Duke in possible "2012 Kentucky" territory, when Anthony Davis and Co. stormed through the dance, never once facing an in-game win probability below 58.3 percent, per KenPom (https://kenpom.com/team.php?team=Kentucky&y=2012). There's definitely a "perfect storm" scenario here in which Duke cruises to Jon Scheyer's first national championship.
Reason to Sell: Secondary Scoring
Boozer never gets shut down, but let's pretend for a moment that it does happen. Who rises to the occasion and carries the Blue Devils through an off night from their star? Maybe Isaiah Evans gets hot from distance, or maybe constant doubles thrown at Boozer results in an all-you-can-eat buffet at the rim for Patrick Ngongba. We've also seen Caleb Foster put the team on his back on occasion—though, the last such occasion was at least a month ago at this point. Even those second-, third- and fourth-leading scorers are far from sure things to show up in a big way on any given night, though. Thanks to foul trouble, Ngongba only scored four points in the loss to UNC. Evans scored four points on just four shots in the loss to Texas Tech.
Verdict: Selling
Between Duke's two losses, Boozer went for 47 points, 19 rebounds and 10 assists, while the supporting cast was unable to carry its share of the load. You typically need great guard play to last deep into the tournament, and does Duke have it? They have a problem similar to Iowa State's in which you wonder/doubt whether Foster or Evans is going to go get a bucket in a pivotal moment. Evans did nail the game-winner against Florida back in early December, but it felt ominous that Duke's big plan in the final minute of a tie game against UNC was back-to-back possessions in which Boozer was handed the ball beyond the three-point arc and asked to be the hero.
- Michigan Wolverines
8 of 9
Consensus Odds: +488
Reason to Buy: Overall Efficiency
Saint Louis is leading the nation in effective field-goal percentage on both offense and defense, which is preposterous. But while the Billikens have put up those numbers against a strength of schedule that ranks around 200th in the country, Michigan is top five in both eFG% categories against a top-10 schedule, which is perhaps even more preposterous. On the defensive side of things, Aday Mara is an eraser at the rim, while both Yaxel Lendeborg and Morez Johnson Jr. also block their fair share of shots. It's almost impossible to get easy buckets against the Wolverines. Meanwhile, their ability to get out and score in transition is second to none, so they're able to get easy buckets on a regular basis. Quite the lethal combo.
Reason to Sell: The Curious Case of Elliot Cadeau
Michigan has played in just five games this season decided by fewer than 10 points, and it's hardly a coincidence that four of those five games were also four of Elliot Cadeau's five worst games of the season. He did have a great showing in the loss to Wisconsin, but in the four close calls, Michigan's primary backcourt presence shot a combined 10-for-32 from the field with 16 assists against 22 turnovers.
Verdict: Selling
Michigan's literal big three of Mara, Lendeborg and Johnson is fantastic. However, Cadeau is the X-factor. And I'm not exactly not worried about what happens if and when the Wolverines run into an opponent that can keep fast-break chances to a minimum and force them to play a half
